Dear Matt,

I exchanged with you on this matter some messages in September 2017, and after that I exchanged also other messages with Bruce Ravel in December 2017 and January 2018. He told me that he was very busy with its new beamline and had no time to adapt Artemis so that it could use feff 8.5L. This was of course long ago. If Artemis can now use the output of feff 8.5L, I'm glad to know and will try it. I presume that it will be enough to tell Artemis the location of this feff code.

On the other hand, I do not use normally Larch, although I know about it. Are there advantages in using Larch instead of Artemis?

Thanks anyway for the clarification.

Best wishes,

José Carlos

Hi José,

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 1:51 AM José C. Conesa <jcconesa@icp.csic.es> wrote:

Hi,

As far as I know, Artemis can only work with the format files produced by feff 6.

Artemis can definitely work with output of Feff8.  Lots of people do this.

I tried months ago to urge the Artemis authors to make it work with at least feff 8.5L (which is free for everyone to download), but this does not seem to have been fruitful.

Feff85L (Feff8 for EXAFS) is included with Larch and the results can definitely be used with Artemis.   

What is the problem you were having?

--Matt

-- 
José C. Conesa
Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC
Marie Curie 2, Cantoblanco
28049 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34)915854766