----- Original Message -----From: Anatoly FrenkelTo: MAMarcus@lbl.govSent: Monday, September 24, 2007 6:59 PMSubject: RE: [Ifeffit] Artemis fitting using FEFF paths plus experimentalreferencesMatthew - please forward my reply to the list if you consider it appropriate. I am spammed out. Anatoly*************************Matthew,May be it is not relevant, since I do not know if you have a series of EXAFS data at different stages of the oxidation, or just the initial and the final stages. If you do have several stages, including the starting (unoxidized) and final (oxidized, or a sum of oxidized and unoxidized, depending where you stopped at) ones, the principal component analysis seems to match your needs well. I assume you also have access to EXAFS data in bulk magnetite and maghemite references.PCA analysis may tell you (if you are lucky and your system is similar to those where such information was previously obtained):1) The volume fractions of intermediate species at each stage of the oxidation:2) Identities of each intermediate speciesThe first part is entirely model-independent. The second part is not, but a reasonable selection of standard compounds (e.g., magnetite or maghemite) may help you isolating the intermediates. The good thing is that you do not need to fit a Fe-Fe and Fe-O bonds to the spectrum of the entire heterogeneous sample, where these contributions may be present in different species, and you have a large number of fitting parameters that describe such a model. Instead, you may end up obtaining that your species are identical with their bulk reference compounds (and thus no fit is required since the only thing you need to know is the volume fraction of this species) or, you may have to fit a couple of FEFF paths to that unknown species, after you deconvolute it from the mixture knowing what the rest of the phases are (it is doable in the case of one intermediate, but can be done in the case of a larger number of intermediates as well).Anatoly-----Original Message-----
From: ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov [mailto:ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov]On Behalf Of Matthew
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 7:05 PM
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: [Ifeffit] Artemis fitting using FEFF paths plus experimentalreferencesI have a system in which Fe:C alloy nanoparticles are being oxidized. I have the EXAFS of the unoxidized nanoparticles, and I'd
like to use that as a reference
for fitting as in:
Fe_EXAFS(oxidation_stage) = x*(unox_particles)+(1-x)*(Fe->O paths + Fe->Fe paths +...)
where the Fe->O and Fe->Fe are based on magnetite and maghemite, which seem to be products of the oxidation. It's not just a linear
fit to
unoxidized+magnetite+maghemite because the oxide is somewhat disordered. If I do Artemis fits to the shells from the two oxides
alone, I find I lose
some Fe atoms (sum of fractions < 1), a result which is echoed in linear-combo fits to the oxides alone. Thus, I really want to do
a hybrid fit. The unoxidized
particles are highly disordered to the point where they don't fit well with reasonable shells, so I'd rather not have to represent
them as FEFF shells.
How can I do this hybrid fit?
mam
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit