Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the response. I am confusing about the two plots. Could you please explain more about the difference?

image.pnghttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/231097049_Cs_L-edge_EXAFS_atomic_absorption_background/figures?lo=1



image.png


Kind regards,


N. C. Tien




Mangold, Stefan (IPS) <stefan.mangold@kit.edu> 於 2021年7月1日 週四 下午3:38寫道:
normal for every element,

the higher the energy, the larger is the penetration depth —

regards

Stefan Mangold

Am 01.07.2021 um 06:13 schrieb 田能全 <tien.nengchuan@gmail.com>:


Hi everyone,
My colleague sent me data of liquid CsNO3 sample measured using fluorescence model. According to the attached figure, I don't understand why mu(E) increased with increasing energy before and after the L3 edge. Does it make sense for cesium?  Thanks.

Nengchuan
<image.png>
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit

_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit